Acquisition And Cross-Servicing Agreement Sri Lanka

However, as Samaranayake points out, proposed defence pacts with the United States tend to be controversial in the first place. That is what happened, for example, with India, when the United States followed logistics and communication pacts. “New Delhi has finally concluded these agreements,” she notes. The agreement is valid for 10 years and all transactions must be agreed before the transfer. Logistics support authorized under this agreement cannot be transferred beyond the forces of the receiving party without the consent of the non-receivers. Given the strong opposition to it, it may seem bleak for Sri Lanka and the United States to reach an agreement on SOFA. Meanwhile, Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe informed Parliament that SOFA was still under discussion and that his government would not sign an agreement that would undermine Sri Lanka`s sovereignty. The Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) is negotiated on a bilateral basis between the United States and its NATO allies or coalition partners, allowing U.S. forces to exchange the most common types of assistance, including food, fuel, transportation, ammunition and equipment. The agreement does not commit a country to take military action. STAs also exist between third countries. Japan and South Korea have both formed ACSAs with countries other than the United States.

[1] That is why we are asking the government to immediately disclose the full consent of the public,” the JVP Politburo said in a statement. Sri Lankans, however, remain skeptical. Part of the problem lies in the fact that there is “little information in public opinion” about the “specificities” of the agreements. The government initially said the details of the agreement would be disclosed to the public, but has so far kept it a secret. The United States has ACSA agreements with 89 other countries around the world. “The categories of authorized goods and services include food, oil and transportation. The provision of weapons or ammunition systems is expressly prohibited under this agreement,” the U.S. Embassy said in a statement.

Such a “routine and very modest” agreement was reached with 89 other countries, said Steven Mann, assistant secretary for Central and South Asia at the U.S. State Department, during his recent visit to Colombo. “The discussion policy agreement appears to be aimed at streamlining procedures for authorizing the U.S. military`s visit,” said Nilanthi Samaranayake, director of strategy and political analysis at CNA, a non-profit research organization in the Washington area. Two defence cooperation agreements between the United States and Sri Lanka, the acquisition and cross-service agreement already signed (ACSA) and the under-negotiated Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), are causing concern, criticism and controversy on the Indian Ocean island. With acSA talking about mutual cooperation in peace operations, the JVP Politburo asked on Tuesday whether the agreement would facilitate the establishment of a U.S. peacekeeping force on the war-torn island. The JVP opposes the admission of foreign peacekeeping forces to Sri Lanka. The same could be true for Sri Lanka, especially when the political campaign is over.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by admin. Bookmark the permalink.

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /homepages/7/d328811302/htdocs/teamalter/wp-includes/class-wp-comment-query.php on line 405

Comments are closed.